Search for: "Smith v. AC"
Results 1 - 20
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Smith successfully challenged the constitutionality of sodomy laws in the landmark Supreme Court opinion, Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 7:53 pm
Michelin North America (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:02 am
But, despite the risk that the applicant's business would close if the termination went ahead, an injunction to prevent the termination of the licensing agreement (applied for under the Arbitration Act 1996 s.44) was refused by Mr Justice Stuart-Smith. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:56 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:45 pm
Paul Smith: In the Reno v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:52 am
It's Ancon Ltd v ACS Stainless Steel Fixings Ltd [2008] EWHC 2489 (Pat) is a Patents Court decision for England and Wales from Mr Justice Patten.Ancon owned a patent for a channel assembly. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
On 8 March 2019, interim judgment was handed down in the apparently unremarkable case of Justyna Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospital Trust [2019] EWHC 552(QB). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:10 pm
• Types IV, V and VI. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm
Smith v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB) (27 May 2022) concerned claims for damages for both breaches; whilst Sterritt v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2022] NIQB 43 (09 June 2022) concerned the privacy of one of the hackers involved in the second breach. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
This concept was described in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46, [2013] 1 AC 236 (“Rubin”) as the “administration of multinational insolvencies by a leading court applying a single bankruptcy law”. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
In Emma Murray v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v Waltham Forest and Smith v Haringey. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The House of Lords decision in R v Salford HA Ex p Janaway Lady Smith found support for her interpretation in the case of R v Salford HA Ex p Janaway [1989] 1 AC 537. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 am
v. [read post]
